This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
chrish at consol.net
chrish at consol.net
Mon Apr 2 13:38:11 CEST 2012
hi! On 04/02/2012 01:13 PM, Sascha Luck wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:10PM +0200, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > >> Good to hear that the working group affected is supporting the proposal. >> Perhaps this is the most important. > > What is the current status of organisations wrt the PDP? I remember a shitstorm about that in a different context (2007-01?). > IIRC the outcome was that organisations don't get a say except through > their individual members? ripe represents the community - the plenum being the sum of the individual persons. identifying a commercial IXP syndication as 'the most important' player regarding the question whether IXPs should be treated special regarding commons of the community is in my eyes - errr - "amazing" :) regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]