This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Fri Sep 30 07:17:13 CEST 2011
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:13:04PM -0700, Michel Py wrote: > > Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > My worry horizon isn't the next 3 years, it's the next > > 10-50 years. We need to enable renumbering and multihoming > > without DFZ slot for end entity, and easing PI requirements > > just makes the chance of this actually being implemented > > that much less likely. > > I hate to sound brutal, but why should I believe that you will find the > Holy Grail that everyone else has been searching for over the last 15 > years? I heard it all, I wrote part of it. There is NO solution to make > renumbering easy and there is NO solution nearly as good as PI for > multihoming. > > Michel. DFZ slots are for those who pay for them... /bill
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]