This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Fri Sep 23 16:26:59 CEST 2011
Hi, > Hi Sasha, > >> I thus withdraw my support for this change unless the "extensive >> documentation" requirement is removed. > > > This is not part of the policy but a suggestion to the RIPE NCC. It seemed useful information to have, but if people think it is not then we won't suggest this to the NCC. However, all of this is part of the implementation (which is up to the NCC) and not part of the policy. The policy hasn't changed. > > Considering that this well-intended suggestion to the NCC seems to have caused controversy and distract from the actual policy proposal we will not send the suggestion to the NCC. while i certainly think that this idea was well intended (it actually makes some sense to me in general, but not in this context), i am happy to hear that we can go on with this one without any more discussion. Still supporting 2011-02 :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind Regards Sascha Lenz [SLZ-RIPE] Senior System- & Network Architect
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]