This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Fri Oct 28 17:52:44 CEST 2011
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ole Troan <ot at cisco.com> wrote: <snip> > finite => there are 67 million /29s. and there is what < 15000 ISPs in the world? > given that we only use 1/8 of the IPv6 address space for this model of addressing. do we get it wrong, we have 7 more tries. > the biggest hurdle we have now is to get IPv6 deployed; if we don't succeed in that it doesn't much matter that we have conserved address space that no-one uses... ;-) +1 :-) -- Roger Jorgensen | rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]