This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Fri Oct 28 13:51:36 CEST 2011
Hi, > On 25/10/11 10:51, Emilio Madaio wrote: > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-05 I want to start with stating that I support the overall intention of this proposal. On the topic of why this should be placed in the final /8 and the combination of LIR's and IXP's, I would ask the community look into the following: There are basically 2 types of IXP's and in order to make use of this particular type of space, I would recommend that it would be limited to none commercial - not for profit - IXP's. - Commercial IXP's aka for profit IXP's, should also be able to sign-up for a LIR status and get IP space from there. - Non-profit IXP's, for the good of the internet, should be able to get IP space under this particular policy. This should be fairly easy for an IPRA to check. Regards, Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]