This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI ?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI ?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Fri Oct 28 11:25:59 CEST 2011
Hi Thomas, > Four days ago the current phase on > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-02 > > ended (Sep.26th-Oct.24th). What now? This means that all the great minds of the RIPE WG's (the WG chairs) need to agree that consensus was reached (or not) and give their feedback to the AP-WG chairs. When they all agree there is consensus, they will inform Emilio and us on the outcome. There is no formal time for that step and in some cases did could take some time, due to the history of a proposal or the amount of time it takes for some of the WG chairs to go through all the emails. But having a RIPE meeting next week might help in a nudge or two :) This is what I've heard on the process as it was explained by Sander to me. Regards, Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI ?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]