[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal

On 10/28/11 11:14 AM, Remco Van Mook wrote:
>
> Dear Ahmed,
>
> I would have completely agreed with you five years ago. Problem is, we've
> managed to run out of time and 6rd is one of the few transition protocols
> that has a chance of being implemented in many eyeball networks in the
> next 12-18 months. I don't like 6RD much either (actually I also don't
> like how IPv6 reserves 64 bits for the host part), but this is address
> policy and not the protocol police.
>
> Address space that is used is not wasted, and if LIRs use it below the
> thresholds set in IPv6 allocation policy (which, surprise surprise, 6rd is
> likely to do) at least those LIRs won't be entitled to any followup
> address space until they've cleaned up.

+1

Thnx :)

Cheers, Jan