This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] ring-fencing v4 space for IXPs in 2011-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ring-fencing v4 space for IXPs in 2011-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Thu Oct 27 21:30:22 CEST 2011
Hi there, On 27 Oct 2011, at 19:05, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > OK. Thanks Andy. I raised this as a theoretical concern. So provided the IPRAs can keep a lid on potential abuse of the policy, that's (sort of) fine. That'll be "good enough" IMO. I don't have a strong objection to the proposal even though I still have some reservations. Thanks for helping to give the policy proper scrutiny and for your support ! Best wishes, Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ring-fencing v4 space for IXPs in 2011-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]