This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Babak Farrokhi
babak at farrokhi.net
Wed Oct 26 08:19:02 CEST 2011
Hi, I support this policy. Babak On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Andy Davidson wrote: > > > Hi there, > > On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:57, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I support this proposal. >> >> One question: >> Is it the same /16 in 5.6.2 as in 5.6.3? >> Or does that mean that two /16 will be held back? > > Hi > > Thanks for your support. > > An additional /16 is proposed. > > Andy >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]