This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Oct 25 08:49:39 CEST 2011
On 10/24/11 8:56 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: > My personal opinion on 6RD is: if it is to be treated as a special > case, it should be a special case, meaning it is a temporary > allocation (like all others, but with emphasis), valid only so long it > is used. A 6RD allocation should be 100% 6RD and no other use of it > should be allowed, so that it can easily be returned once the 6RD > deployment is no longer in use. > > That, or, roll native. ;) Hi, Special case means special IPv6 space and special allocations out of that and that means burning RIPE-NCC resources claiming that space back later on - and good luck with that, as we know that allocations rarely can be returned, because somebody deployed something else in that space and is now sorry :) Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]