This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 Proposal Accepted (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Mon Oct 24 18:02:22 CEST 2011
Hi there, On 24 Oct 2011, at 14:29, Remco Van Mook <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote: > Organisations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to > receive an initial allocation of /32. For initial allocations up to /29 no > additional documentation is necessary. > > Organisations may qualify for an initial allocation greater than /29 by > submitting documentation that reasonably justifies the request. If so, the > allocation size will be based on the number of existing users and the > extent of the organisation's infrastructure. Support the policy in general (so please implement in some similar form after discussion) but strongly support the exact methodology proposed by Remco above. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 Proposal Accepted (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]