This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Fri Oct 21 14:02:16 CEST 2011
On 21 October 2011 12:42, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > I'm not exactly sure how you're proposing to modify this? "Special case > for 6rd only"? Send a guidance note... "Dear IPRAs, The AP-WG believe that 6RD as discussed in RFC5969 is a valid reason to request more than a /32 in order to give end user networks a sensible level of address space but please make sure that requests above a /29 have followed the correct mathematical calculations. Love The AP-WG" ... this doesn't require a change to the policy (correct me if I'm wrong) and stops people just requesting a /29 without a challenge. J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]