This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at googlemail.com
Thu Oct 6 07:36:43 CEST 2011
Hella Geza, On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Turchanyi Geza <turchanyi.geza at gmail.com> wrote: > How many IPv6 entries can be added if the total capacity of the line card is > 0.5M IPv4 routing entry? Are there no line cards with larger capacity in development? Will we still be limited to 0.5M when the problem (i think it is a long term problem) arises? Don't get me wrong, I know what your concerns are, and I think you have good reason for them. I just don't like fitting IPv6 development (if there still is one, sometimes we are just stuck) into routers, I would rather change the routers to cope with the "new" technology. I haven't seen much line cards holding DFZ in my life, since I used quagga and bird. Why is this such a big problem with those line cards? Is it _our_ problem or the _vendors_ one, once the table reaches 0.5M? Would you buy a line card that cannot handle your line? regards, danrl
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]