[address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call

Turchanyi,

It looks like we're circulating back to the same
implementation-specific, 10-year-old-router-design arguments:

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Turchanyi Geza <turchanyi.geza at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>>
>> If IPv6 PI follows IPv4 PI, it's not going to blow up in the near future.
>>
>> My worry is long term, not short term.
> How many IPv6 entries can be added if the total capacity of the line card is
> 0.5M IPv4 routing entry?

If the capacity of any packet forwarding engine cannot fit X+Y route
entries, it cannot fit X+Y route entries. Gotcha.

While I speak only for myself, I think I dare say that your voice of
reservation towards the policy proposal has been heard on the list.

Best,
Martin