This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed Oct 5 11:39:49 CEST 2011
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > I still missed the arguments why would provide any help in the > transition if PI allocations would be "liberized", just to be pleased > for a small set of PI belivers? Well, there are many tens of thousands of them in the RIPE region alone, don't know if that can be called "small". > Blowing up the DFZ is a big problem. It should not happen in the near > future. If IPv6 PI follows IPv4 PI, it's not going to blow up in the near future. My worry is long term, not short term. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]