This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jörgen Eriksson
jorgen.eriksson at iis.se
Tue Oct 4 10:18:21 CEST 2011
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: >My dystopian view is that this won't be fixed but instead vendors will >have to create routers that can handle many million of routes in the >next decades. > As they have done during the last 20+ years. This is the way of the Internet. If you want to be there - keep upgrading! Yes, it cost money. Big money. And if your business case does not include this - sorry, but then you have done a really bad job! /Jorgen
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]