This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at googlemail.com
Tue Oct 4 08:41:59 CEST 2011
It is time for PIv6 to become really as easy as * filling out the form (as one did for PIv4) * signing the contract (as one did for PIv4) * paying the fees (as one did for PIv4). I have seen people using SixXS tunnels to be more provider independent. Seriously! Tunneling the traffic of hosts/servers, who are IPv6 capable and well-konfigured through IPv4 is not what we want at all, is it? regards, Dan Luedtke -- danrl / Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]