[address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:26:11PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 30/09/2011 09:28, Turchanyi Geza wrote:
> > In summary: we do not have the technology which would allow a very liberal
> > PI allocation policy, therefore a very liberal PI allocation policy is not
> > possible now.
> > 
> > Strict limits must be kept.
> 
> I get the impression that people are talking about something which lies
> somewhere between "very liberal" and "strict limits".

Indeed, and to stress a point that Mikael has already made: even with that
change, it's still not "single click" easy to get PIv6.  PIv6 still needs 
application forms to be filled, a contract to be signed, and yearly fees to 
be paid - which shifts the balance somewhat away from "PIv6 is the easy
way" (but if people have appropriate usage scenarios, it's still *possible*
to get PIv6).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279