This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Sat Nov 19 12:23:19 CET 2011
On 11/18/11 10:44 PM, Daniel Suchy wrote: > I support this. There's no reason to allocate more than /32 for LIR by > default. In special cases, there's no reason to block that allocation, > but someone has provide some arguments to support his requirement.... We thought of putting suggestion to mention what LIR will use the space for if request is bigger than /32, but we figured out, that this is too technical requirement to put it into policy. IPRA can always politely ask, what is intended space usage (for documentary reasons, not justification). We could put this in policy proposal as what happens if this reaches consensus, but not in the policy itself. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]