[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"

I agree. 

On 14 nov. 2011, at 11:13, James Blessing wrote:

> It seems that the consensus is that up to a /29 is the right amount of
> space for the majority of networks, if that is the case I've  think we
> should add the following:
> 
> ==
> 
> 5.1.x
> 
> Organisations that have already received their initial allocations are
> able to request additional address space up to a /29 without supplying
> of further documentation as if they were a first time requestor.
> 
> ==
> 
> The logic being that this solves the problem for networks who deployed
> before this change and avoids the issues with HD ratio (which I think
> needs some looking at, but not here)

Sound reasoning!

Kind regards,

Job