[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?

Dan,

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at googlemail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Turchanyi Geza
> <turchanyi.geza at gmail.com> wrote:
> > nothing stops th IPv4 PI owners to use IPv6 PA....
> - except that one has to renumber the whole network when finally (if
> ever) receiving PIv6
> - which leads to about double costs
>

I am happy to hear that you made the transition and you are using IPv6 PA.


> In fact, I have a mixed network (PIv4, PAv6) at the moment, but I am
> still wondering why I cannot get assigned PIv6. What changed?
>

PI does not scale! We regret this, however, we can not forget this!

There is only one way to keep the routing table in  a handable status:
massive PA use.

I hope, you will be glad with your current provider and do not need to
renumber in the near future. Anyhow, renumbering is not so hard if your
network was designed with the requirement of renumbering in mind...

Best,

Géza


>
> regards,
>   Dan
>
> --
> Dan Luedtke
> http://www.danrl.de
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111109/52aaecf1/attachment.html>