This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Tue Nov 8 20:28:38 CET 2011
On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Erik Bais wrote: >>>> I tell you, widespread PI adoption is poison for the network. >>> Maybe, maybe not. >> No, really, it is. > And sorry to burst your bubble, but you are wrong and the information (read > as: the facts and not as gut feelings) from the other RIR's show (from those > that have a similar policy in place) that the number of v6 PI prefixes is > not taking the steep jump. :-) 'An optimist is someone who jumps off a tall building and after 50 floors says, "So far, so good."' Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]