This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Mon Nov 7 10:02:43 CET 2011
Hi Dan, nothing stops th IPv4 PI owners to use IPv6 PA.... Good luck, Géza On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at googlemail.com>wrote: > > Nudge received :-) We are still going through the whole mailing list > archive to see which concerns were raised and how they were addressed. > Quite a lot of messages were sent about this proposal over the last months! > We're working on it. > > Good to hear that. I (as many other IPv4 PI "owners") can't wait to > geht my IPv6 PI. > > regards, > > Dan > > -- > danrl / Dan Luedtke > http://www.danrl.de > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111107/546c9c8a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]