This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] HD-ratio (was: 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Sat Nov 5 12:26:17 CET 2011
On 11/5/11 12:16 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > I think I mentioned this a few times before: if you think the HD ratio > is using the wrong number, or if you think the HD formula is completely > wrong to start with, please submit a policy proposal to change this to > whatever you think would work better. > > But this is somewhat out of scope for the discussion of 2011-04 and > should not be discussed in *this* thread. +1 Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] HD-ratio (was: 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]