This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Is RPKI opt-in?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is RPKI opt-in?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Tue May 31 23:07:20 CEST 2011
On 05/31/2011 05:44 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > On 31 May 2011, at 16:33, Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > >> I'd like to note that RPKI is essentially an opt-in technology. > > Depends on your definition Andrei. Once upstream ISPs insist on ROAs, > the choice of opting in (or out) is made for you. I don't think they'll adopt this quickly. It's a new technology, not widely supported by vendors yet (on all platforms used for routing, that means not only "flag ships"), some large operators are also conservative in terms of any changes, even in running software... It's also a bussines case - upstream ISPs will not force their customers to RPKI. They'll loose their money, if they will... Even I'm supporting this technology, I don't make illusions here. Lessons learned from "speed" of IPv6 adoption should be taken in account. So this technology should be handled as opt-in... - Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is RPKI opt-in?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]