This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is RPKI opt-in?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrei Robachevsky
andrei.robachevsky at gmail.com
Tue May 31 17:33:08 CEST 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Malcolm Hutty wrote on 5/31/11 12:34 PM: [...] > I suggest that this is important input to this WG's decision as to > whether it believes 2008-08 (or any successor proposal) is in fact > useful, i.e. whether it is likely to do more good than harm. > I'd like to note that RPKI is essentially an opt-in technology. Without issuing a ROA, which is an ISP decision, not much changes compared to how things are today. We are not switching on secure routing with adopting this policy, the ISPs will have plenty of time to decide for themselves what the fear more - route hijacking or some crazy law wiping their network out. Andrei -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3lCjQACgkQljz5tZmtij8yFQCgpUZ36e+d8LhoyB0T7HixR6Lg +KcAoLtclX30uvfUCC+DCPRySFFTXnSj =o0N4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is RPKI opt-in?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]