This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue May 31 10:54:24 CEST 2011
Hi Malcolm, > If after all this discussion you still think those criticising 2008-08 > are the ones trying to "fix broken political approaches" through RIPE > policy I don't see how we're ever going to agree. It's not about agreeing at this point in time, it's about moving forward: at the last RIPE meeting you said that RPKI has risks what we shouldn't take without thinking about them and without looking for alternatives. In the hallway after the discussion you promised me to do research. As far as I can remember you would: 1) study the discussions in the IETF and other places to see why RPKI design decisions were made the way they are 2) see if there is a better way to secure routing that provides (90%-100%) the same benefits without the major risks as you see them 3) of course taking 1 into account while doing 2 Can you give us a status update on this? Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]