This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Schachtner
andreas at schachtner.eu
Tue May 24 09:17:56 CEST 2011
Am Tue, 24 May 2011 08:13:54 +0200 schrieb Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com>: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Suchy <danny at danysek.cz> > wrote: <snip> > ... > > I think you might missed the same fine point I did... RIPE NCC can > still return addresses to IANA and those addresses will not fall in > under the /8 rule? If IANA in such a case redistributes resources to the RIR, e.g. RIPE NCC, they will fall under the /8 policy as it is right now. BTW, I do support the proposal. Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Schachtner afs Holding GmbH communication technologies & solutions http://afs-com.de/ Geschaeftsfuehrer Andreas Schachtner HRB 15448, Amtsgericht Dortmund
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]