[address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Remco Van Mook
<Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> The decision to give returned address space back to IANA is outside the
> scope of (this?) allocation policy. The text in this policy however
> explicitly leaves room for space to be returned to IANA, instead of just
> stating that any and all returned space MUST be placed into the "final /8
> pool", which would have been a valid interpretation had the phrase you
> quote below not been present - that would block all options to return
> space to IANA, which would be bad to have in policy.
>
> Hence the 'the below is only valid for space we already decided is not
> going back to IANA'.

When I now re-reading the text again in the right context I see it.
But if I'm the
only one that missunderstood it I guess it's okay.



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           |
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no