This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Sun May 22 16:33:37 CEST 2011
Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:15:15PM +0200, Daniel Stolpe wrote: >> When every LIR has had their /22, there might still be address space >> available, right? I interpret 1 a and b as we will have a deadlock >> then because the same LIR can never receive another allocation. > > Well... > > - this is the whole *point* of the "last /8" policy - to give people that > want to start a business "with Internet things!" a few years in the > future the chance to get a few IPv4 addresses to run their NAT64 boxes > (and whatever other migration technologies need IPv4 addresses) on. > > (IPv4 will still run out, though, and nothing we can do will change that). well, how about opening new LIR, getting IPv6 + IPv4 and merging that LIR with other LIR... Then the OTHER LIR will have more than single /22 from the last /8.... Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]