This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon May 9 22:06:47 CEST 2011
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >I fully agree. Mind you, they could just as well just make a law that says >"You may not route any packets to/from addresses that appear on list X" and we >would have exactly the situation everyone seems to be afraid of, and it doesn't >need RPKI. As soon as laws don't allow 'your network, your rules' anymore then >anything can happen... But that is something that we'll have to steer through >voting, not address policy :) > >- Sander > Right now, this does *not* work effectively because the internet routes around such censorship attempts and there is no LEA that can reach *everyone* in the world. This policy proposal changes that. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]