This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Sat May 7 05:31:53 CEST 2011
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Gert Doering wrote: > We still don't know, but given that IPv4 PI is much less restrictive, > IPv4 PI is only contributing 21% of the BGP routes in the RIPE region, > and the restrictive IPv6 PI policy is holding up deployment plans, > people are asking to get this changed. <meetings.ripe.net/ripe-53/presentations/address_space.pdf> seems to indicate that it's 59% ? Is there newer data available that shows what's happened since 2011 that could be had? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]