[address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6

>> Why do you think: "50 EUR PI with no technical requirements for
>> multihoming or other is a recipe for longterm disaster in my book." ?
>> 50 Eur works today for IPv4 PI space as well.
> 
> As far as I know there is still multihoming requirement for IPv4 PI.
> 
> And if you have read my other email, I am extremely sceptical about
> the global routing system being able to handle the hundreds of
> thousands of PI blocks I believe we're going to see if this policy
> changes.
> 
> We need other means for people to easily change addresses and
> multihome, shoving this into the global routing system is not the
> right longterm solution.

i am extremely wary of people changing addresses and multi-homing.  what
if, while they were changing addresses, a gang of hooligans stole the
addresses just as they were changing them?  or, if while they were
multi-homing, a dutch court reposessed one of the homes?  while this
would not be a traditional home, being a new kind of home, the courts
would have great latitude in its action.

randy