This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Curran
jcurran at arin.net
Thu May 5 12:29:57 CEST 2011
On May 5, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Malcolm Hutty wrote: > ... > Once the RIPE NCC comes to be seen as a "gateway controller" that can > significantly impact the reachability of "bad" networks, it will > irrevocably become a ongoing target for use as a tool of public policy > enforcement. Malcolm - Is the existing RIPE Database (both as address and routing registry) seen or not seen as a "gateway controller" per above? I think it would be helpful to the point to outline why the current system has not been an ongoing target, and why one based on RPKI will irrevocably become one. Thanks! /John
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]