This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] legal input into NCC operations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] legal input into NCC operations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: legal input into NCC operations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Thu May 5 10:47:07 CEST 2011
On 5 May 2011 10:31, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > On 5 May 2011, at 09:21, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > >> The problem here is that all of a sudden dutch courts might have direct >> operational influence in all of the RIPE region. > > You seem surprised that an organisation established in tbe Netherlands is > subject to the jurisdiction of the Dutch courts. Maybe we should start a discussion about alternative (new or old) legal entities (and their locations) that might be more suited to running the RPKI db /me runs J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] legal input into NCC operations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: legal input into NCC operations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]