This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed May 4 17:13:54 CEST 2011
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:02 +0200, Randy Bush wrote: > > If the community (as evidenced by this WG) tells the RIPE NCC not to > > implement this (or more precisely to withdraw the service they are > > already offering) then we simply open the way for private > > certification companies in the RIPE region. > > in which case, i would prefer to arrange a pro-bono one. So would I. But I can imagine going to my boss and saying "there are two alternatives for securing my address space: a pro-bono, best effort thing run by Randy or a professional one run on a commercial basis by Mega-Certicates Plc. Which would you like me to use? Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]