This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed May 4 12:21:52 CEST 2011
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Daniel Suchy wrote: > And /48 can be assigned from /32 PA easily, there's lot of space > available. And then easily announced into the BGP and almost nobody will > filter it (see current IPv6 table)... Currently, yes. Long-term, no. There are plenty of ISPs who do not filter on /24 IPv4 either, but a lot do. I expect in a few years that most will filter on /32 for PA space and /48 for PI space. The only reason it's not done today is that people haven't made it a priority because there are so few IPv6 routes. So advising subnetting /32 further and announcing them in the DFZ might work short-term, but you do it at your own risk long-term. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]