[address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call

Hello Immo,

>>> I don't think that denying that fact and just walk away would get us any further here again.
>> I welcome research and debate of this and alternative solutions to
>> achieve the goal of avoiding the Youtube incident or making its impact
>> less hurtful.
> 
> Fine. Thats exactly what I think should be done. Take the concerns
> mentioned seriously and put further work to resolve the problems.
> 
>>> In contrary, if people seriously start to demand it and we are going to say "well,
>>> we will not do something here" then they will start doing that in
>>> some other forum, which i would presume is much worse as we here
>>> can discuss and raise our concerns.
>> Hopefully, the respective WG's at RIPE will remain in charge of the
>> PDP process of their respective areas?
> 
> If the WG is just sticking their head into the sand and just says
> 'no, we're against it' without supplying any strategy to archive a
> solution everybody can live with, this may well change. 
> 
> And that was exactly my point here. Work must be going towards that
> solution and not just discarding the current one. 
> 
> I hope that clarifys things.

Thank you for your reply. As co-chair of this working group I can only add extra emphasis here: this is a working group, let's work towards a solution. If you are in favor of this policy proposal or agains it: please provide arguments that we can discuss.

Thank you,
Sander Steffann
APWG co-chair