This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Tue May 3 16:40:57 CEST 2011
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:20, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote: > I am not stupid, I of course know RIPE is never going to charge 2kEUR per > year for PI even if I want them to. Wouldn't it make sense to argue for goals you have a chance of achieving instead of dragging out a fringe discussion about things that will not happen anyway? > Also, I am going to save this email and bring it out in 5 years and let's > see how many 50EUR/year PIs there are in the world then. I guess that's the > only way to find out. Fine by me. To put my money where my mouth is and as "hundreds of thousands" implies 200,001 or more, how about this bet: If, on the 1st of May, 2016, there are 200,001 or more IPv6 PI routes (1/5th of which need to be from RIPE space) in the global routing table, I will owe you one good bottle of rum. If this condition is not met, you owe me a good bottle of rum. "Good" means all rums in the blend need to be at least 8 years old and it must not be from any company manufacturing industrial paint solvents like Bacardi or Havanna Club. I maintain a separate calendar for bets so this would not get lost. > I am not heated, I am resigned about nobody here caring about the common > good. Your definition of the common good seems to diverge from the one most of the other people posting in this thread. Disagreement is fine, implying others are careless and ignorant, not so much. > Seems shared cost is "someone elses problem". As long as "my hobby > project" is important to me, I should get to pollute without paying. Again, € 50 / year * PI prefix is not free. > And at 50EUR per year, heck, I'd PI my home connection in a blink. Why > wouldn't anyone? Mainly because you do not have a need and will not get it routed on a normal home connection. Same as for almost all other home, or business, connections. Richard PS: Arguably, "hundreds of thousands" means 300,001 or more, but I am confident 200,001 will not be reached so the point is moot.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]