This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue May 3 16:03:56 CEST 2011
On Tue, 3 May 2011, poty at iiat.ru wrote: > so, basically what you are saying is that you know that your routers > need an upgrade in 5 years and you don't want to pay for an upgrade or > you can't figure out a business plan which covers the costs for that? Paying for the upgrade by having higher prices towards end-customer is what is going to happen all across the world if we get hundreds of thousands of Ipv6 PI. So everybody pays, just not the ones causing the problem. Classic externalising of costs. See my earlier links. > But you are telling small ISPs/NCOs/"hobbyusers"/whatever THEY don't get > their business plan right if they don't can afford paying $$$ for PI > space or rather would prefer to pay other bills with the money? WTF?! I guess you don't belive in "polluter pays". -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]