This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue May 3 13:43:29 CEST 2011
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Alex Vishnyakov wrote: > It's your mistake that you don't care, because it's not just my issue - > I can bring here to this discussion more then 1000 ISPs from Russia and > Ukraine, who are using PIs IPv4 now and want to move to IPv6 technology, > but cannot, because of the policy and people like you, and then it will > become very quickly a global issue. Or 1000 of ISPs is still a small > number for you ? It's more than million potential IPv6 users, content > servers etc. You're seriously saying 2EUR per year per customer (1000 customers) breaks their back? If it does, then they should look into other solutions such as renumbering each time they switch upstream provider instead of externalising the cost to the rest of the world. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_cost#Externalities> -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]