[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR

Hi,

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:45:36PM +0300, Andrey Semenchuk wrote:
> So, the strong recommendation to give customers between a /48 and a /64 
> (and /64 even for a single machine) - is the right way to lay the 
> foundation of a new address space exhaustion

Please do some basic math.  Number of /56s in FP001, number of people 
the earth can sustain.  How many /56s per person.

Add to that that we're only assigning from FP001, so even if it turns
out that the world can sustain 1000x more humans than everybody thinks
possible today, we have 6 more FPs to try again.

Right now, we should try to get rid of conservationist IPv4 thinking, and
*do the math* that clearly shows that with IPv6, you can affort that.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110503/4ac1d293/attachment.sig>