This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue May 3 08:50:38 CEST 2011
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Tero Toikkanen wrote: >> Is this really true? IPv6 PI at 50EUR/year? > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-499 "set fee of EUR 50 for each independent Internet number resource assignment" Oki, I don't know enough about the ripe billing system , but I do know that if we get many more hundreds of thousands of PI assignments (regardless of v4 or v6), the global routing system is going to be in real trouble. And regarding per-item billing being low, I refer to: <http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/demotivators/irresponsibilitydemotivationalposter.jpg> No Single Raindrop Belives It Is To Blame For The Flood. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]