This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue May 3 07:47:07 CEST 2011
On Sun, 1 May 2011, Martin Millnert wrote: > Though, 50 EUR/year for PIv6 for each one of the ISPs customer is merely > 4 EUR/month per customer. And they get their own /48 PIv6 prefix! ;) Is this really true? IPv6 PI at 50EUR/year? In the last discussion we had on this list, it was indicated that it was NOT the case, and it would be a lot more expensive (1000+ EUR per year). I am all for raising the yearly IPv4 PI price to the same level as well. Also, if you have a /32 PA it was my understanding that generally the encompassing /29 is already reserved for you as soon as you provide justification, so this will keep down the number of DFZ announcements for PA blocks. That's the main reason I don't want to see IPv6 PI proliferation, we're trying hard to keep down the number of IPv6 DFZ routes, let's not explode it by allowing easy PI. Let's keep the pressure up on other ways to multihome instead. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]