[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR

> If you give your customers a single /128, you're forcing *them* to use
> NAT.  This is bad.
> 
>> Probably the simplest way will be subnet /64 or smaller, where part of 
>> IP will be MAC address of enduser.
> 
> The strong recommendation is to give your customers something between
> a /48 and a /64.  NO LESS, unless you know for sure(!) that they only
> have a single machine, and no network behind it.

ok, I understand the concept.. still have to wait for proper BRAS and 
CPE implementations...

And I understand, that i.e. /64 for subscribers network is something 
that in IPv4 PI world would be forbidden (i.e. /29).
If all of us agree, that there is enough address space for every 
toothbrush, subscribers can get something between /48 an /64 and this is 
will be usual, and even in IPv6 PA space there will be no every subnet 
registration (as I understand, and as it is requiured for IPv4 PA) - why 
IPv6 PI can not be similar to IPv6 PA then ???



Regards,
Marcin