This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Mar 30 13:17:19 CEST 2011
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:28:19AM +0000, Tero Toikkanen wrote:
> Also, policy interpretation within RIPE NCC should be sorted out (unless
> it already is), as I distinctly remember getting IPv6 PI for a customer
> for hosting purposes a year ago.
Nothing wrong with "I run my own datacenter and host my own servers there,
and want to number them with my own IPv6 PI space".
The bit where you provide services "to other parties" is where things get
problematic, when the policy has a "no sub-allocations / sub-assignments to
3rd parties" clause. (No need to enumerate the large amount of different
possible ways to run "a hosting business" here)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]