This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tero Toikkanen
Tero.Toikkanen at nebula.fi
Wed Mar 30 11:17:31 CEST 2011
> > And according to IPRA, if you provide hosting services on your own > > infratructure to other companies, you are sub-allocating part of your > > PI address space to them, so you cannot use PI address space for that > > purpose. > > With that interpretation, isn't it impossible to use IPv6 PI space to provide > addresses to personal computers? > > But seriously---does the working group think that IPv6 PI space should not > be used for hosting customer web sites, and that the current policy does not > allow this? http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509#----pa-vs--pi-address-space "PI space cannot be re-assigned or further assigned to other parties." The text is the same for IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI, but you still can't get both for the same use. Why not? In my opinion the policy is the same for both, but it seems it's not interpreted in the same way. ____________________________________ Tero Toikkanen Nebula Oy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]