This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] The IANA contract and 2011-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The IANA contract and 2011-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 19:08:09 CET 2011
On 21 March 2011 18:05, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > On 21 Mar 2011, at 16:48, boggits wrote: > >> Since we've had a joyful time with this proposal before, what happens >> if we pass it *but* ICANN fail to get the IANA contract this time round? > > Hopefully nothing. IANA will no doubt continue to implement the consensus > policies that have been developed by the community, just as it's always > done. I would expect that this would be a key condition of the IANA contract > being awarded to some other organisation. One would hope so, but the wording of the policy explicitly references the organisation, a minor wordsmithing to take this into account could resolve that... J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The IANA contract and 2011-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]