[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question - Not for ISP but hosting

> Having said this, the current requirement (multi-homing) is a way to
> avoid pet IT projects.
>
> I'm currently in the process of writing a policy change document on
> the policy RIPE-512 that would remove the multi-homing requirement
> and suggests an increase of the PI IPv6 cost to 250 euro per yearly
> maintenance fee for the LIR. The increased cost for the LIR for a PI
> IPv6 prefix, should have a similar effect.
>
It's fine, but it will not fix the problem of hosting companies that do 
not want to become LIR (mainly for financial reasons) just to get their 
own IPv6 address space.
We have to realize that the transition to IPv6 depends on content 
availability. As long as hosting companies will have impeded access to 
something as basic as IP addresses, we can forget about transition at all.

Regards
-- 
Adrian