[address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02

Hello Jim,

Your comments are 100% valid, however one of your conclusion might be
misleading.



James, the NCC Board does not make policy. For address management
> policy-making, it's this WG which does that. [The name of the WG is a big
> hint... :-)] I hoped everyone knew that. The Board's job is to oversee the
> NCC on behalf of its members but not get involved in operational matters.
> Besides, by the time a policy proposal gets in front of the Board (impact
> assessment, etc), the PDP is in the end-game and the proposal is pretty much
> the settled will of the RIPE community.
>

This is 100% valid.


>
> In this case, the Board seems to be saying it doesn't think the proposed
> solution is ideal but will go along with what the RIPE community decides.


What else the Board could do?



> I'm sure that if the Board felt that decision was not in the best interests
> of the NCC, they wouldn't keep quiet about the matter.
>


???


Best,

Géza
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110630/154d7693/attachment.html>